7023963 : Simple fixes to anon diamond in the jdk.
David.Holmes at oracle.com
Thu Mar 3 20:43:04 UTC 2011
Kumar Srinivasan said the following on 03/04/11 05:40:
> Please review, corrections to the diamond operator on anonymous classes
> as suggested by langtools team.
Looks fine of course, but it is sad that it is necessary. I wonder what
percentage of potential diamond usages this kills? :( Pity we couldn't
just detect the non-denotable types and give a compilation error.
More information about the core-libs-dev