7023963 : Simple fixes to anon diamond in the jdk.
maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
Thu Mar 3 22:38:28 UTC 2011
On 03/03/2011 20:43, David Holmes wrote:
> Kumar Srinivasan said the following on 03/04/11 05:40:
>> Please review, corrections to the diamond operator on anonymous classes
>> as suggested by langtools team.
> Looks fine of course, but it is sad that it is necessary. I wonder
> what percentage of potential diamond usages this kills? :( Pity we
> couldn't just detect the non-denotable types and give a compilation
Changes look ok - thanks Kumar.
More information about the core-libs-dev