7030249: Eliminate use of LoadLibrary and other clean-ups

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Tue Mar 29 13:48:50 UTC 2011

Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> I'll admit that I'm not following this C code horribly well, but overall it does look much cleaner.
> As well as I can follow it, it looks good.
> In the Makefile, could we get some comments as to why the lib's are needed and also some
> comments as to what the delayload means and why it is important? I could guess, but I'd prefer
> some makefile comments to help the next poor soul looking at it. ;^)
Thanks Kelly. I'll add a comment to make this clearer athough this isn't 
really new as there are other places in the build where /delayload is 
used too.


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list