Code Review - 6818464 TEST_BUG: Timeout values in several java/util tests are insufficient

David Holmes david.holmes at
Mon Nov 21 01:37:39 UTC 2011

<sigh> I see this was already pushed.


On 21/11/2011 10:47 AM, David Holmes wrote:
> Gary,
> On 19/11/2011 2:46 AM, Gary Adams wrote:
>> I think this change is ready to commit, just need
>> a sponsor for the last push (Mandy/David?).
> As I've said before the reference to tdThread must be volatile as you
> are communicating the value from the timer thread to the main thread. So
> the idiom of using a one-element array instead of a static field is not
> applicable in this case as you can not declare an array with volatile
> elements.
> David

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list