[PATCH FOR REVIEW] Potential Buffer Overflow in java_props_md.c
ahughes at redhat.com
Wed Aug 8 11:40:08 UTC 2012
----- Original Message -----
> On 08/08/2012 01:33, David Holmes wrote:
> > On 8/08/2012 2:40 AM, Xueming Shen wrote:
> >> Andrew,
> >> Since we are here:-) are we also supposed to "free" the old_temp
> >> at #250
> >> and old_temp and old_ev at the end?
> > No. They are aliases for temp and encoding_variant, which are freed
> > at
> > the end. There are only ever at most two things to free.
> > Andrew: this is fine by me, but needs TL approval (Alan?)
> You are a reviewer on the jdk8 project so Andrew should be all set.
> any case, the update looks good to me too.
Looks like we all are, from the census :-)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
More information about the core-libs-dev