typo in comments of JVM_SupportsCX8 in jvm.h
david.holmes at oracle.com
Fri Jun 8 01:51:10 UTC 2012
On 8/06/2012 6:39 AM, chris hegarty wrote:
> Looks fine Kris (given the same change is being made to
> I can sponsor this for you. We can use the same bug number seeing as
> these are two separate repositories.
Bzzzt! No you can't!
In theory you can use one CR to cover a combined change across multiple
repos (eg open and closed).
But you can't use one CR to cover a change in two different components:
hotspot and jdk. One has to be filed against jvm->hotspot->whatever, the
other against java->java->whatever.
> On 07/06/2012 21:10, Krystal Mok wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> As discussed on hotspot-compiler-dev , I came across a typo in the
>> exported jvm.h in the jdk workspace while working on 7174218.
>> The fix is simple , and sync up with the changes in 7174218:
>> diff -r 7def50698e78 src/share/javavm/export/jvm.h
>> --- a/src/share/javavm/export/jvm.h Thu May 24 16:15:58 2012 -0700
>> +++ b/src/share/javavm/export/jvm.h Wed Jun 06 01:15:50 2012 +0800
>> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@
>> JVM_AssertionStatusDirectives(JNIEnv *env, jclass unused);
>> - * java.util.concurrent.AtomicLong
>> + * java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong
>> JNIEXPORT jboolean JNICALL
>> Could someone review and sponsor this fix, please?
>> Kris Mok
More information about the core-libs-dev