Bug 7176907 - Patches for javac warnings cleanup (text and util) from Adopt OpenJDK
kurchi.subhra.hazra at oracle.com
Tue Jun 26 18:29:37 UTC 2012
Thanks for updating this. This looks good to me. I guess Stuart will be
sponsoring the patch.
There are a couple of other switch statements in
which are not throwing fallthrough warnings (in Netbeans at least),
although there is fallthrough happening from one case to another. From
what I notice, only if there is a break statement
missing before the "default" case, does Netbeans throw some warning. Is
the fallthrough warning technically
supposed to be thrown only when the logic falls through to the default
On 6/25/2012 5:54 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
> Hi all,
> Apologies for the delay. So it was simply a case of human error in
> missing that last fallthrough (we wanted to double check that our
> warnings script wasn't failing, hence the delay in getting back to
> you). I've respun the patch with the extra SuppressWarning.
> Hopefully the patch is complete now.
> On 20 June 2012 17:18, Martijn Verburg<martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> We'll look into it, hopefully have an answer for you shortly - M
>> On 20 June 2012 17:07, Kurchi Subhra Hazra
>> <kurchi.subhra.hazra at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> I was just going through the patches, there are some more fallthrough
>>> cases in
>>> src/share/classes/java/util/regex/Pattern.java.(for example in line 2247).
>>> Are these not generating warnings?
>>> - Kurchi
>>> On 6/20/12 7:30 AM, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> Apologies, I didn't check that attachments were stripped. The patches
>>> can be found at:
>>> Hi Martijn,
>>> the two patches looks good.
>>> A minor nit, why is there a space between the '(' and the readUByte() in
>>> Thanks for the quick review! No reason on the whitespace, I've fixed that
>>> Quick question. Is there a checkstyle or jcheck that we should be
>>> applying to any corelib patches going forwards?
More information about the core-libs-dev