Review Request for CR : 7144861 RMI activation tests are too slow

Stuart Marks stuart.marks at
Thu May 10 04:28:13 UTC 2012

On 5/9/12 8:26 AM, Olivier Lagneau wrote:
> Given that we want to push the code quickly, I don't think I should go for such
> a large IE cleanup for this fix,
> which is meant to provide better exceution speed only.
> I suggest to follow Stuart's proposal first (i.e. reassert and return
> immediately in my code changes) ,
> and create a dedicated new CR regarding proper handling of IE in all the rmi
> tests (low priority).
> Do you agree with this ?

Yes, this seems like a sensible approach. The new CR might also cover the 
cleaning/unification of all the retry-repeatedly-with-time-limit loops that are 
spread through this code.



More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list