7197491: update copyright year to match last edit in jdk8 jdk repository
lana.steuck at oracle.com
Fri Nov 2 16:18:51 UTC 2012
Thank you for doing this. I see that Kumar volunteered to be your reviewer.
So are you pushing the change today?
> BTW: Would it make sense to integrate jdk8/tl -> master next week too?
I thought about this too and yes, this would make everybody's life easier.
I can start TL PIT as soon as you push the change (please let me know
when you push it).
On 11/02/2012 09:07 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 13:44, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> I'm not sure what you are looking for here, but I skimmed quickly up
>> and down the patch stopping occasionally, and the updated headers
>> look ok.
>> On the general issue, is there a reason what on the 1st of January
>> ever source file cannot have its year range updated to that year.
>> Then just forget about it until the next year? Anyway, I'm ok with
>> this as is for now.
> I was just looking for a reviewer so that I could push this change and
> get it out of the way. Steve has the engine running in the get away
> car :-)
> I think there needs to be wider discussion as to how to deal with the
> copyright dates. It regularly comes up during code reviews because
> some reviewers insist on the dates being updated. I don't know if a
> yearly on Jan 1 will work as there will be outgoing changes in the
> team forests that will be missed. Also I'm not sure we want to leave
> it as long as a year anyway. Every few months or periodically at
> integration time feels right to me although I don't have a strong
> opinion on this topic.
More information about the core-libs-dev