Invalid "self-closing element not allowed" JavaDoc error
scolebourne at joda.org
Fri Jul 26 13:23:15 UTC 2013
On 26 July 2013 13:58, David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/26/2013 04:39 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>> Its websites and
>> browsers that define what should be accepted as HTML, not standards.
> This is the craziest thing I've read all week.
What percentage of the worlds websites contain valid HTML/XHTML
according to the DOCTYPE/validator?
I'd be amazed if its more than 1%.
The Oracle home page, java.net, java.com and J2SE download page all
fail validation. Yet all are perfactly usable websites.
Tim Berners Lee said in the linked article: "Some things are clearer
with hindsight of several years. It is necessary to evolve HTML
incrementally. The attempt to get the world to switch to XML,
including quotes around attribute values and slashes in empty tags and
namespaces all at once didn't work".
This isn't Java EE. HTML is a space where standards are a *guide*. I
absolutely stand by my statement.
More information about the core-libs-dev