Request for review- RFE 8005716

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at
Tue Mar 12 12:36:08 UTC 2013

On 11/03/2013 15:37, BILL PITTORE wrote:
> On 3/11/2013 9:40 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 08/03/2013 02:22, BILL PITTORE wrote:
>>> Moved the string allocation into buildJniFunctionName as Alan 
>>> suggested. Built and tested on windows and linux. Updated the webrev:
>>> bill
>> I see this updates the method descriptions to take on board Jeremy's 
>> comment on the possibility of the library being statically linked 
>> with the main executable with or without the VM. To be complete, I 
>> think this will require an update to the UnstatisfiedLinkError 
>> description too.
>> Thanks for moving the sizing/allocation of the function name into 
>> buildJniFunctionName as that is cleaner and safer. Is FILENAME_MAX 
>> really the right limit to impose?
> Maybe JVM_MAXPATHLEN is the better choice.
As it's a symbol rather than a file path then it's probably not right 
either. I guess the question is whether a limit needs to be checked here 
or not.


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list