Request for review fix for 8010668

David Holmes david.holmes at
Mon Mar 25 01:34:48 UTC 2013

On 23/03/2013 9:15 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 22/03/2013 21:02, BILL PITTORE wrote:
>> This fixes a problem with the recently committed changes for JNI
>> static libraries. On an error condition or explicit unload request,
>> statically linked libs should not be unloaded.
>> thanks,
>> bill
> This looks good to me too, sorry we missed this when reviewing the
> original changes.

I am curious as to the lifecycle of a statically linked library. When 
would we "load" and "unload" it? Can we actually attempt to run the 
load/unload hooks multiple times ?


> -Alan.

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list