Please review two corrections for java.time
joe.darcy at oracle.com
Fri Sep 13 23:52:09 UTC 2013
Looks fine; cheers,
On 9/13/2013 12:07 PM, roger riggs wrote:
> Ping, Reviewer needed for these minor updates, the test is now more
> robust thanks to Peter's nudging.
> Please review for two corrections:
> - The java/time/tck/java/time/TCKLocalTime test failed on a slow
> runtime due to -Xcomp;
> the test should be more lenient. The test is not appropriate for
> a conformance test
> and is moved to java/time/test/java/time/TestLocalTime and is
> updated to be
> more robust in the face of DST changes.
> - The javadoc for the JapaneseEra.MEIJI era should indicate the start
> date is 1868-01-01
> to be consistent with java.util.Calendar. Note that java.time does
> not permit dates before Meiji 6
> to be created since the calendar is not clearly defined until then.
> Thanks, Roger
More information about the core-libs-dev