RFR [8023130] (process) ProcessBuilder#inheritIO does not work on Windows

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Sun Sep 15 19:49:13 UTC 2013

On 15/09/2013 12:06, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
> :
> I decided to check whether this test really detects the failure, and 
> run JPRT job with the new test but no fix included.
> Unfortunately, the new test *does not* fail with unmodified jdk.
> The same thing happens when the test is run with jtreg locally.
> I believe it is so, because the tested program is run not directly 
> from a console, and this is the condition for the bug to manifest itself.
> So I have to exclude the test, as it really doesn't check anything new.
> I'm going to add noreg label and write an instruction to the QA about 
> how to test the fix manually.
> What is good is that we don't need another shell-based test.
> Here's the new webrev: 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8023130/3/webrev/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eigerasim/8023130/3/webrev/>
> Its only difference is that the shell script is excluded.
JPRT may be using ssh but others will likely run the tests in other 
configurations. If the shell test allows the scenario to be tested in 
other configurations then it may be better to just include it in your 
patch (in general we want to eliminate as many shell tests as possible 
but a shell tests bets the cost of a manual test any day).


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list