Implicit 'this' return for void methods
Ulf.Zibis at CoSoCo.de
Wed Apr 2 10:58:29 UTC 2014
Am 02.04.2014 11:08, schrieb Andrew Haley:
> On 04/01/2014 10:20 PM, Eirik Lygre wrote:
>> What is the relationship between this "naked dot" proposal and the
>> "chaining of void methods" proposal? The reason for asking is not to be
>> negative, but rather to find out if these issues are best dealt with
>> together, or as independent proposals.
>> I think that if either of these are going to happen, then they must be
>> specified with the appropriate level of isolation: That which belongs
>> together must be processed together; that which belongs apart must be
>> processed apart.
> Point taken, but Project Coin (small language changes) worked well.
If that would help to make things happen, I support the idea to separate both steps to different
More information about the core-libs-dev