RFR (L) 8037210: Get rid of char-based descriptions 'J' of basic types

Christian Thalinger christian.thalinger at oracle.com
Fri Apr 4 23:31:53 UTC 2014

On Apr 3, 2014, at 9:44 PM, John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com> wrote:

> On Apr 3, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Christian Thalinger <christian.thalinger at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Of course they are popular because these are the type names.  There is no type L; it’s an object.  I don’t understand why we have to use different names just because they are used in other namespaces.  This is not a C define.
> They stand for JVM signatures as well as basic types.  The letters are signature letters.  Can we move on from this?

Sure.  Push it.

> — John
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list