RFR (L) 8037210: Get rid of char-based descriptions 'J' of basic types
vladimir.x.ivanov at oracle.com
Mon Apr 7 23:53:15 UTC 2014
I have to do one more iteration:
I have to revert changes related to BMH::reinvokerTarget.
Removal of reinvokerTarget in generated concrete BMH classes introduces
serious performance regression, since BMH::reinvokerTarget is much more
complex than an accessor and it disturbs inlining decisions in too many
On 4/5/14 3:31 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 9:44 PM, John Rose <john.r.rose at oracle.com
> <mailto:john.r.rose at oracle.com>> wrote:
>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 6:33 PM, Christian Thalinger
>> <christian.thalinger at oracle.com
>> <mailto:christian.thalinger at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>> Of course they are popular because these are the type names. There
>>> is no type L; it’s an object. I don’t understand why we have to use
>>> different names just because they are used in other namespaces. This
>>> is not a C define.
>> They stand for JVM signatures as well as basic types. The letters are
>> signature letters. Can we move on from this?
> Sure. Push it.
>> — John
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net <mailto:mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev at openjdk.java.net
More information about the core-libs-dev