8020860: cluster Hashtable/Vector field updates for better transactional memory behaviour

Paul Sandoz paul.sandoz at oracle.com
Tue Apr 15 07:46:34 UTC 2014

On Apr 15, 2014, at 12:54 AM, Mike Duigou <mike.duigou at oracle.com> wrote:
> Should we proceed forward despite these understood limitations? My vote is a very soft "Yes".

I think we can proceed, things are not made any worse for the cases we care about, and i think we can slightly improve things as Martin suggests, plus we can update the documentation on enumerators and iterators.


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list