Move forward for JDK-8029891

Tristan Yan tristan.yan at
Wed Jan 22 01:03:53 UTC 2014

Thank you Mandy
If you want to fix it soon. I am okay to use this bug as the one tracking the fix. BTW This is an intermittent failure.

On Jan 22, 2014, at 8:52 AM, Mandy Chung <mandy.chung at> wrote:

> Hi Tristan,
> On 1/21/2014 4:26 PM, Tristan Yan wrote:
>> Hi Mandy
>> We have discussed bug in JBS. And we don't think this is a good time to fix it. I suggest we do two things for this bug if it's okay for you.
>> 1. We open a new JDK bug for tracking down future JDK change. Also link JDK-8029891 to this new jdk bug.
> Why do we need a new JDK bug?  I think we should use JDK-8029891 and fix it in JDK 9.
>> 2. We put java/lang/ClassLoader/deadlock/ to ProblemList.
> Is this intermittent?  I believe it's not.  Since this is a bug, it's more appropriate to add @ignore to the test as I think I won't fix this soon.
> Mandy
>> Please let know if you agree this.
>> Thank you.
>> Tristan

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list