RFR: 8037948: Improve documentation for org.w3c.dom package
huizhe.wang at oracle.com
Mon Jun 30 20:07:14 UTC 2014
That makes sense. I changed @since back to 1.4 and added L2 in the
On 6/30/2014 12:35 PM, Henry Jen wrote:
> On 06/30/2014 12:26 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
>> On Jun 30, 2014, at 3:22 PM, huizhe wang <huizhe.wang at oracle.com>
>>> On 6/30/2014 12:20 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
>>>> Looks OK Joe, noticed the @since changed as well?
>>> Thanks for review.
>>> Yes. The support for DOM L3 was since JDK 1.5. Previously this
>>> package file mentioned only DOM L2.
>> OK, thank you. Just seemed strange that the overall version was
>> changed as I suspect L3 is compatible with L2. I might have just
>> indicated that L3 was added in 1.5 as the support was initially in
>> 1.4 I believe. I have no strong preference though
> I agree with Lance here, the package itself is included in JDK since 1.4.
> In case classes under this package is not properly labeled with @since
> tag, they will be considered has the same @since as package.html, then
> that would be really misleading.
More information about the core-libs-dev