RFR 9: 8077350 Process API Updates Implementation Review
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Wed May 13 14:55:31 UTC 2015
On 13/05/2015 15:16, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Are there any comments about the use of java.util.Optional in the
> ProcessHandle API?
> Or a review of the changes?
Having parent return Optional<ProcessHandle> looks good.
Having all methods in ProcessHandle.Info return Optional is probably
right, it gives us a bit more flexibility compared to info() returning
I'm not sure abut the destory* methods, the result of a destroy is
essentially a boolean so this feels a little odd.
More information about the core-libs-dev