RFR 9: 8074818: Resolve disabled warnings for libjava
Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com
Fri May 22 14:02:47 UTC 2015
The change to make the assert about the build numbers in getVersionInfo
should be a different issue.
Perhaps it makes sense to do that as part of the JEP 223: New
that is specific to the Oracle JDK.
On 5/22/2015 2:55 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 22/05/2015 01:42, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Oops, got the wrong host:
>> 8074818: Resolve disabled warnings for libjava
>> 8080007: Stop ignoring warnings for libjava
>> Thanks, Roger
> In JDK_GetVersionInfo0 then I wonder if we should change this assert
> to be a fatal error on product builds. Periodically people set the
> build to numbers > 255 and often only see issues when they use a
> fastdebug build.
> Th rest looks okay to me. I don't particularly like the IOE_FORMAT in
> ProcessImpl.c but I think other areas have done similar to deal with
> this warning. ConcurrentPReader_md.c is being removed in another patch
> under review at the moment so might be gone before you push.
More information about the core-libs-dev