RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 9
david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Aug 11 04:29:03 UTC 2016
On 11/08/2016 11:34 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Again, no spec changes, but larger than expected.
The StampedLock functional changes look okay.
> Joe and Amy may be interested in
> where we rewrite flaky tests with new mechanisms that are hopefully less
> We have some footprint tests that try to catch memory leaks, using
> reflective methods that the jigsaw folks might frown upon. There seems
> to be a need for module-privileged code for e.g. whitebox testing and
> running a debugger. Perhaps these tests will be an example of code so
> privileged, someday. Or we could decide such tests are more trouble
> than they're worth and simply discard them.
More information about the core-libs-dev