JDK 9 RFR of 8161402: Provide a javadoc description for java.prefs module

Alan Bateman Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Tue Jul 19 15:19:26 UTC 2016

On 19/07/2016 16:06, Brian Burkhalter wrote:

> It seems to me it would be less work overall if there were only one single issue to subsume adding the verbiage for all modules. There is only one single line of verbiage for each such issue and having so many reviews go around is a lot of noise. Then also if a CCC were required there would be only one. As suggested, there should be consistency in the verbiage without redundancy. A general template for the verbiage should be agreed upon first before the existing issues continue to be addressed or collapsed into one single issue.
I agree, I think we should close the bulk of these issues and replace 
with one issue.

Shura - are you okay if we close all the issues that you created and 
replace them with one?


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list