RFR: JDK-8134373: explore potential uses of convenience factories within the JDK
patrick at reini.net
Fri Oct 7 20:59:53 UTC 2016
Here is the latest webrev:
> Am 07.10.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Jonathan Bluett-Duncan <jbluettduncan at gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
> Sorry for the delayed response, I've been busy lately with university and other things.
> Thank you all for your comments. I'll leave the DateTimeFormatter comment in, as you requested Stephen and Roger, and I'll work again with Patrick as soon as I'm ready.
> Kind regards,
> On 6 October 2016 at 09:38, Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne at joda.org> wrote:
> On 6 October 2016 at 00:00, Stuart Marks <stuart.marks at oracle.com> wrote:
> >> I think you should perform no change to DateTimeFormatter (other than
> >> a comment) as part of this changeset. The behaviour of that
> >> DateTimeFormatter method is subtle, and I now suspect that what we
> >> have there might be the best option.
> > I had recommended removing the comment from DateTimeFormatter, but if
> > Stephen wants the comment in, that's fine with me. In fact I'll defer to
> > what Stephen (and Roger Riggs) want with this code, since they're the
> > maintainers.
> I think it makes sense to leave the new comment in. All further change
> should be under 8167222.
More information about the core-libs-dev