Re: RFR: 6378384 (reflect) subclass can’t access superclass’s protected fields and methods by reflection

Peter Levart peter.levart at
Tue Oct 18 10:55:36 UTC 2016

Hi Mandy,

On 10/18/2016 01:51 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> >Besides, constant names would not be any prettier than class name string literals. At least now it is obvious to anyone what package a particular class belongs to:
>> >
>> >     "a.Package" vs. A_PACKAGE ?
>> >
> Do the suggested variable names help?

They do. What do you say about this variant (compressionLevel=9):

Regards, Peter

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list