Re: RFR: 6378384 (reflect) subclass can’t access superclass’s protected fields and methods by reflection
peter.levart at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 10:55:36 UTC 2016
On 10/18/2016 01:51 AM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> >Besides, constant names would not be any prettier than class name string literals. At least now it is obvious to anyone what package a particular class belongs to:
>> > "a.Package" vs. A_PACKAGE ?
> Do the suggested variable names help?
They do. What do you say about this variant (compressionLevel=9):
More information about the core-libs-dev