RFR: JDK-8133680 add Stream.foldLeft() terminal operation
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Wed Aug 16 12:56:30 UTC 2017
reconsidering old decision is healthy, but you need provide some data/good reason
to explain what has changed.
By example, I'm curious about the number of occurrences of forEachOrdered in the wild, given that fold left (a kind of reduce) will be even less used than a forEachOrdered (a kind of forEach).
On August 14, 2017 2:58:18 AM GMT+02:00, Tagir Valeev <amaembo at gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes, I know. But times change and old decisions could be reconsidered.
>After all, forEachOrdered was included and its semantics is essentially
>same as in foldLeft with respect to parallel streams.
>With best regards,
>14 авг. 2017 г. 2:45 AM пользователь "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr>
>> Hi Tagir,
>> foldLeft (and foldRight) were intentionally not included in the
>> because as you know, their semantics is too strong to be useful for
>> parallel streams.
>> ----- Mail original -----
>> > De: "Tagir Valeev" <amaembo at gmail.com>
>> > À: "core-libs-dev" <core-libs-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>> > Envoyé: Dimanche 13 Août 2017 15:27:36
>> > Objet: RFR: JDK-8133680 add Stream.foldLeft() terminal operation
>> > Please review the preliminary implementation for Stream foldLeft
>> > foldRight operations:
>> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tvaleev/webrev/8133680/r1/
>> > This implementation has no tests yet. Before writing them I'd like
>> > be sure that this enhancement could be accepted in general (or
>> > probably foldLeft is accepted and foldRight is not?) Could anybody
>> > sponsor it when it will be complete?
>> > Thank you in advance!
>> > Tagir Valeev.
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
More information about the core-libs-dev