RFR 8173817: StackOverflowError in "process reaper" thread

Roger Riggs Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com
Tue Aug 22 13:46:59 UTC 2017


One option is to make code the function in a private method and use a 
method reference.
But the code to generate the binding and the lambda mechanism would 
still look appear like magic.

Thanks, Roger

On 8/21/2017 9:42 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> I suspect this won't save any stack frames in the stack-starved 
> thread... but seems like small progress nevertheless.
> Perhaps lambdas that are likely to show up in stack traces should be 
> given real static classes with good names to make those stack traces 
> more readable.
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Roger Riggs <Roger.Riggs at oracle.com 
> <mailto:Roger.Riggs at oracle.com>> wrote:
>     Please review a change to the process reaper completion handler's
>     choice of an anonymous inner class
>     for more consistent stack usage.  Additional background and
>     discussion in the issue 8173817 [1].
>     Webrev:
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-stackoverflow-8173817/
>     <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Erriggs/webrev-stackoverflow-8173817/>
>     Issue:
>     [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173817
>     <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173817>
>     Thanks, Roger

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list