RFR 8173817: StackOverflowError in "process reaper" thread
Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com
Tue Aug 22 13:46:59 UTC 2017
One option is to make code the function in a private method and use a
But the code to generate the binding and the lambda mechanism would
still look appear like magic.
On 8/21/2017 9:42 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> I suspect this won't save any stack frames in the stack-starved
> thread... but seems like small progress nevertheless.
> Perhaps lambdas that are likely to show up in stack traces should be
> given real static classes with good names to make those stack traces
> more readable.
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Roger Riggs <Roger.Riggs at oracle.com
> <mailto:Roger.Riggs at oracle.com>> wrote:
> Please review a change to the process reaper completion handler's
> choice of an anonymous inner class
> for more consistent stack usage. Additional background and
> discussion in the issue 8173817 .
>  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8173817
> Thanks, Roger
More information about the core-libs-dev