RFR: JDK-8186466: Fix accessibility and other minor issues in java.base

mandy chung mandy.chung at oracle.com
Wed Aug 23 00:40:11 UTC 2017

On 8/22/17 5:24 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> It is also the hardest to review the diff.   A specdiff would help 
>> for this specification.  Skimming on the javadoc and seems okay.
> Specdiff has some amount of trouble, and so I don't entirely 
> understand or trust what
> it was trying to show me.   The hard part of this is the updates to 
> the big table at the
> beginning.  To verify that no obvious changes to the spec have 
> accidentally been made,
> I cut-n-pasted the table contents into a plain-text file, for the 
> generated API page,
> before and after the changes. When comparing the two text files, the 
> only changes
> are extra blank lines in the original version, caused by empty table 
> rows, which have
> been eliminated in the new version by using CSS to provide extra 
> whitespace before
> the internal headings. Apart from these blank lines, the textual 
> content of the tables
> is the same, before and after the changes.

Thanks for verifying that.

THumbs up.


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list