RFR: jsr166 jdk9 integration wave 14
paul.sandoz at oracle.com
Wed Feb 1 17:18:43 UTC 2017
> On 1 Feb 2017, at 08:44, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Paul Sandoz <paul.sandoz at oracle.com <mailto:paul.sandoz at oracle.com>> wrote:
> I think that would be too pedantic as well. At this late stage in 9 i prefer to leave things as they are and not fiddle. Revise for 10?
> We could, but jsr166 primitive version control technology doesn't have a mechanism to maintain such distinctions.
Ok. Sorry for being so conservative, just concerned given the schedule.
> I still think the jdk9 docs are misleading and we should do something to fix them. The high-level bit for users is "Bulk operations are non-atomic"! Maybe we should include that sentence?!
More information about the core-libs-dev