RFR: jsr166 jdk? integration wave ?
chris.hegarty at oracle.com
Fri Feb 24 10:59:01 UTC 2017
> On 22 Feb 2017, at 20:30, Martin Buchholz <martinrb at google.com> wrote:
> We half promised "no more jdk9 changes", but ...
> as usual, I think they should go into jdk9, but y'all probably tell me it's
> too late (and that's OK; we can retarget for jdk10)
Are there any spec changes, or all rewordings that do not affect spec
(there’s quite a bit of noise in the webrevs )?
> There's only one line of production code change, in ArrayBlockingQueue.
> The rest is test and javadoc wording improvements, so the risk to the jdk9
> release is rather low.
Sure. Sounds ok.
> Because test changes cannot delay a release, I think rampdown rules should
> not apply to them the same way.
Right, I think that the test changes are fine to be pushed to jdk9/dev.
More information about the core-libs-dev