RFR(xs): (aix but affects shared code too) 8186665: buffer overflow in Java_java_nio_MappedByteBuffer_isLoaded0
thomas.stuefe at gmail.com
Wed Oct 18 07:44:54 UTC 2017
I am wrapping up fixes which did not make it into the repo before the
consolidation. Alan already reviewed the last webrev, but I need a second
Last Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8186665-buffer-ov
Issue text for your convenience:
In Java_java_nio_MappedByteBuffer_isLoaded0, we call mincore(2) to retrieve
the paging status of an address range.
The size of the output buffer for mincore(2) depends on the number of pages
in *system page size* in the given memory range (this is spelled out more
or less explicitly on AIX and Linux, nothing is said on BSD/OSX, but I
assume the same). The number of pages in the memory range is calculated by
MappedByteBuffer.isLoaded() and handed down to
Java_java_nio_MappedByteBuffer_isLoaded0() together with the memory range
MappedByteBuffer.isLoaded() calculates this number of pages based on
jjdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.pagesize(), which ultimately comes down to
For AIX, os::vm_page_size() may return a page size larger than the system
page size of 4K. The reason for this is that on AIX, memory can be backed
by different page sizes, usually either 4K or 64K - e.g. posix thread
stacks may have 4K pages, java heap (system V shared memory) with 64K
pages, but mmap memory is always 4K page backed...
But as the OpenJDK code base generally assumes one homogeneous page size
for everything - which is usually synonymous with os::vm_page_size() - a
decision had to be made which page size to assume as a global system page
size, and this may be a larger page size than the 4K system page size
This usually is no problem, but with mincore(2) it is: as the size of the
output buffer depends on the number of pages, calculating with a too-large
page size causes the output buffer to be too small and hence the buffer
overflows. The solution must be to base the size of the mincore output
buffer on the system page size.
Thanks and Kind Regards, Thomas
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>
> On 31/08/2017 19:01, Thomas Stüfe wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>> thank you for your review!
>> Updated webrev:
>> erflow-in-mincore/webrev.01/webrev/ <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7
>> I fixed the indention and embellished the comments around the sentinel at
>> the end of the buffer somewhat.
>> This looks okay to me.
More information about the core-libs-dev