[10] RFR(M) 8182701: Modify JVMCI to allow Graal Compiler to expose platform MBean

Daniel Fuchs daniel.fuchs at oracle.com
Wed Sep 13 09:28:39 UTC 2017

Hi Jaroslav,


   77         @Override
   78         public Set<String> mbeanInterfaceNames() {
   79             return Collections.singleton(name);
   80         }

This is not correct. The return set should be a set of
MXBean interface names, as in Class.getName(), not a set
of MXBean ObjectName strings.

The interface in question must be implemented by the
concrete MBean instance and must be a subclass of

It is not required for an MBean to implement such
an interface - if it doesn't then it simply won't
be obtainable from ManagementFactory::getPlatformMXBean
or ManagementFactory::getPlatformMXBeans.

So I suspect that in your case, since mbeanInterfaces()
returns an empty set then mbeanInterfaceNames() should
also return an empty set.

IIRC mbeanInterfaceNames() was introduced so that
you could query for a particular MBean implementing
a given interface without necessarily triggering the
loading and initialization of all interfaces implemented
by all MBeans.

best regards,

-- daniel

On 12/09/2017 18:44, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
> Dear reviewers,
> after several reconsiderations I have webrev #4 ready for your review. Can you
> please take a look at
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jtulach/8182701/webrev.04/
> and let me know if it is in a reasonable shape? Thanks a lot.
> -jt

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list