Review Request JDK-8164512: Replace ClassLoader use of finalizer with phantom reference to unload native library
mandy.chung at oracle.com
Wed Sep 27 03:36:02 UTC 2017
On 9/26/17 7:35 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> On 27/09/2017 12:11 PM, mandy chung wrote:
>> On 9/26/17 7:06 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>>> It is not tied with the Cleaner change. Instead, the FindClass bug
>>>> blocks the finalizer to Cleaner change.
>>>> FindClass bug is uncovered when I implemented the change from
>>>> finalizer to Cleaner (or phantom reference). There is a test
>>>> calling FindClass to look for a class defined by the class loader
>>>> being unloaded, say L. L is not Gc'ed and so FindClass successfully
>>>> finds the class (which resurrect the class loader which was marked
>>>> Is that clearer?
>>> So the issue is only that this test breaks??
>> No. The test reveals a bug in JNI_FindClass that uses a class loader
>> being finalized as the context when NativeLibrary is the caller.
>>> And you want to change the FindClass spec to make it clear the test
>>> is what needs to be changed?
>> No. It is a bug in the hotspot implementation. The JNI spec says
>> that the context of JNI_OnUnload being called is unknown. The hotspot
>> implementation of FindClass uses the class loader associated with
>> that native library as the context when invoked from JNI_OnUnload
>> which is wrong.
> I'm not sure I agree it is wrong. As I've said elsewhere there's a
> good chance that if you are trying to load classes via FindClass as
> part of a unload hook (which implies you are using custom
> classloaders), then it may be only the current loader or a parent
> (still custom) can load that class. But we're on the fringe of
> realistic expectations here as the context is specified as being
For a native unload hook to access some class defined by this class
loader, definitely it should not write to any fields since the class and
class loader are not strongly reachable. Reading the current state
stored in the class can be done by writing to the native fields.
I'd like to know what other use cases that FindClass must ressurrect a
class defined by this class loader or find a class defined by its
ancestor if you have any in mind that the existing code can't be
replaced due to the proposed change.
> That said given the spec says "unknown" the behaviour of the VM could
> change and still be in spec.
> I presume that when using a cleaner the current classloader that would
> be used by FindClass is the system loader? Hence the observed
> behaviour of FindClass "changes" if you switch to the cleaner from the
> finalizer - and can't be reverted to the old behaviour by using a
> command-line flag. Hence if we want to be able to revert we have to do
> that in a FindClass-only change first. Then drop-in the cleaner update
> and remove the flag.
>> I will file a separate JBS issue to separate this JNI bug.
> Okay. I see this as a RFE not a bug per-se: change from "unknown
> context" to a specific well known context.
This case is arguable whether it's considered as a RFE or a bug because
the current spec of JNI_OnUnload and JNI_FindClass are not aligned. I
lean toward a bug. The bottom line: do you agree with this proposed
JNI spec change?
More information about the core-libs-dev