RFR 8200788 : Optimal initial capacity of java.lang.VarHandle.AccessMode.methodNameToAccessMode
claes.redestad at oracle.com
Thu Apr 5 13:03:56 UTC 2018
looks ok, but the cost/benefit ration of adding a standalone regression
test for every
such inefficiency seems dubious to me. Could we group these together,
Bonus startup points if you rewrote so that AccessMode.values() is only
since it clones the backing array.
On 2018-04-05 09:04, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
> Yet another HashMap that can be preallocated more accurately.
> Currently, the map is created as the following:
> // Initial capacity of # values is sufficient to avoid
> // for the smallest table size (32)
> methodNameToAccessMode = new
> Even though the comment suggests that no resizes of the table should
> occur, in fact the threshold is calculated as 32 * 0.75 = 24, so when
> 24th element is inserted then the internal storage is reallocated and
> the content of the table is reinserted.
> Also, a missing @modules line is added to the regression test that was
> pushed with the fix for JDK-8200696.
> Would you please help review this?
> BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200788
> WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/8200788/00/webrev/
More information about the core-libs-dev