Optimized version of CopiesList.hashCode()
orionllmain at gmail.com
Sat Dec 1 04:34:50 UTC 2018
I think we should choose Tagir's version so you don't need my OCA.
сб, 1 дек. 2018 г. в 06:38, Stuart Marks <stuart.marks at oracle.com>:
> On 11/30/18 8:52 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Tagir Valeev <amaembo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I can file an issue and create a webrev, but I still need a sponsor
> >> and review for such change. Martin, can you help with this?
> > As usual, I'm only half paying attention, but I can be your shepherd.
> (I'm still digging out from my backlog. Perhaps Martin and I are competing
> who has less time....)
> A quick process check: are the proper OCAs in place? 
> If Zheka is authoring, he'll need to have signed the OCA. (Or he'll need
> to be
> doing this work on behalf of a company or organization that has signed the
> If Tagir is authoring, he's good, since he's already signed the OCA.
> Zheka, even if you're not authoring this changeset, if you intend to
> to OpenJDK in the future, you might want to work on an OCA. It's not a
> bit of bureaucracy, but it does take a few days, and you'll probably want
> avoid lack of an OCA blocking a future contribution.
> Otherwise, thanks and carry on.
>  https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html
More information about the core-libs-dev