RFR 8189717: Too much documentation of ProcessBuilder.start copied to ProcessBuilder.startPipeline

Lance Andersen lance.andersen at oracle.com
Fri Jul 13 19:26:44 UTC 2018

Hi Roger,

I am struggling with the wording at:

* Subsequent modifications to any of process builders in the {@code builders}
1198      * argument will not affect the returned {@link Process}.


Maybe specified/provided  process builders  

Not sure, will think about it a bit.

Otherwise I think the changes are fine
> On Jul 13, 2018, at 3:07 PM, Roger Riggs <Roger.Riggs at oracle.com> wrote:
> Please review a doc change to improve the description of ProcessBuilder.startPipeline.
> The clarifications are not intended to imply any change in behavior and only focus the description
> on the steps taken for each command in the pipeline.
> (A CSR will be needed also when the wording is finalized).
> Webrev:
>    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rriggs/webrev-process-8189717/
> Issue:
>    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8189717
> Thanks, Roger

 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list