RFR (JDK11/doc-only) 8199176: Accessibility issues in java.base docs
huizhe.wang at oracle.com
Fri Mar 23 18:42:58 UTC 2018
Thanks Roger! I'll check this changeset in for now to fix the
accessibility issue, with a note that a future solution that correctly
generates the appropriate and consistent headers is desirable.
JDK-8199895 may be used for further discussion.
On 3/23/2018 10:49 AM, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> Looks fine.
> (I would be in favor of a future solution that correctly
> generated/fixed up the appropriate headers;
> Manual editing and corrections are an unnecessary overhead.)
> Thanks, Roger
> On 3/21/2018 6:47 PM, Joe Wang wrote:
>> They look ok. They actually go better with the package name when they
>> are just 1 level down instead of 2, that is, <h2> rather than <h3>
>> for the titles when the package name is <h1>. If we don't want the
>> strong emphasis on the titles, we could lower the package name
>> generated by javadoc to <h2> instead of <h1>. Then we could keep the
>> Most of the package-info pages have already used <h2> for titles,
>> which is why we're fixing only a handful of them here. Consider:
>> *Currently using <h2>:*
>> In the later page, it actually started with <h1> :
>> <h1><a id="jvm_mods"></a>Summary of relevant Java Virtual Machine
>> *Currently using <h3>:*
>> On 3/21/2018 2:39 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>>> On 3/21/18 2:28 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>>> On 21/03/2018 19:08, Joe Wang wrote:
>>>>> *Item 3*: Heading leavels should only increase by one
>>>>> This is due to the javadoc tool generates a header with an
>>>>> addition of headings, in this particular case, <h1>. The fix for
>>>>> this particular case is to replace the <h3>s with <h2>.
>>>> I assume this has the effect of increasing the size of the
>>>> headings. Does it look okay? I assume many of these usages of h3
>>>> choose that to avoid heading in very large font.
>>> I know accessibility fixes are important, but usability is important
>>> too. The uses of h3 were previously consistent across different pages.
>>> We could remediate the problem either by figuring a design that has
>>> javadoc put a similar set of headers on every page (thus rendering
>>> this changeset unnecessary) or else changing the stylesheet so that
>>> <h2> on a package-summary page looks the same as <h3> on a class
>>> page (which sounds icky, even as I type it.)
>>> -- Jon
More information about the core-libs-dev