RFR: JDK-8213480: update internal ASM version to 7.0
david.holmes at oracle.com
Wed Nov 14 04:13:00 UTC 2018
On 14/11/2018 12:40 am, Brian Goetz wrote:
> But don’t they? We intend to start generating condy in classfiles from
> javac soon; at that point, anyone not using ASM7 will fail when reading
> classfiles generated by javac.
See later email. They need this for nestmates now as well.
>> On Nov 8, 2018, at 4:03 AM, David Holmes <David.Holmes at oracle.com
>> <mailto:David.Holmes at oracle.com>> wrote:
>> Is it that case that the code the uses the ASM library, like the JFR
>> code and jlink code, and the tests, doesn't actually _have to_ change
>> to specifying Opcodes.ASM7 unless they plan on using ASM7 features? If
>> so then you could split out the actual update of ASM from the updates
>> to the users of ASM (some of which may be quite fine with ASM5).
More information about the core-libs-dev