RFR: JDK-8227684 : jpackage must handle win32 mangled names in jli.dll
andy.herrick at oracle.com
Fri Jul 26 12:22:10 UTC 2019
On 7/25/2019 5:29 PM, Alexander Matveev wrote:
> Do you know if all 32-bit builds will have "_JLI_Launch at 56"?
> Also, I think @56 is ordinal which can be used to load function by
> this number instead of the name, so I do not think you need to specify
> My suggestion is to try "JLI_Launch" first and then "_JLI_Launch" and
> then "_JLI_Launch at 56", if we doing 32-bit build.
Oracle does not support, build, or test the jdk (or jpackage in
particular) on 32 bit platforms, nor use jpackage to package 32 bit apps.
We will take submitted fixes (such as this one) from others who do use
32 bit builds, provided they do not break our 64 bit builds in any way.
That being said I think we should take this fix "as is", and allow
Robert (or any other contributor who is using 32 bits) to propose any
further 32 bit related changes,
> On 7/25/2019 8:22 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>> It looks fine.
>> -- Kevin
>> On 7/25/2019 6:20 AM, Andy Herrick wrote:
>>> Please review the jpackage fix for bug  at .
>>> This is a fix for the JDK-8200758-branch branch of the open sandbox
>>> repository (jpackage).
>>>  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227684
>>>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~herrick/8227684/webrev.01/
>>> Submitted by: Robert Lichtenberger
More information about the core-libs-dev