[8u] RFR: 8142543: Unformatted code example in API

Aleksey Shipilev shade at redhat.com
Wed Sep 18 20:32:36 UTC 2019

On 9/18/19 10:23 PM, Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
> So AFAIU from the above wiki page - first 8142543 should be closed as dup of 8073347, 

For this case, I would comment in JDK-8142543 that JDK-8073347 fixes the same thing, without closing
as dup yet. Then finish the backport, then maybe close as dup. There are weird interactions between
"open" and "closed" 8u versioning here...

> then 8073347
> should be labeled jdk8u-fix-request with a comment like
> Fix Request (jdk8u)
> Patch is trivial (documentation-only). Only slight path modification is required due to
> repo-consolidation past 8u, after which patch applies cleanly.

Yes. You might also mention it fixes the regression introduced by JDK-8019857.


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list