RFR: clean up test/jdk/java/util/RandomAccess/Basic.java
lance.andersen at oracle.com
Thu Sep 26 12:36:39 UTC 2019
Overall I think this looks ok.
A few minor comments
Please add 8229338 to the @bug line
I might suggest adding either a comment to the DataProvider or the test which uses it with an overview of the parameters to make it easier and quicker for future maintainers to know the intent.
Lines 86 and 91, you could if you want use String.format and just substitute the changed values.
Your testCopy and testFlil methods you can probably consider using a DataProvider so that you can also test other types such as Vector or was this intentional to omit them ?
> On Sep 26, 2019, at 4:38 AM, Patrick Concannon <patrick.concannon at oracle.com> wrote:
> Would it be possible to have my fix for JDK-8229338 reviewed?
> This a general refactoring of test/jdk/java/util/RandomAccess/Basic.java as outlined in JDK-8229338 'clean up test/jdk/java/util/RandomAccess/Basic.java'.
> Further information on this bug can be found here: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8229338
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pconcannon/8229338/webrevs/webrev.00/
> Kind regards,
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering
1 Network Drive
Burlington, MA 01803
Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>
More information about the core-libs-dev