RFR 8241073: Pre-generated Stubs for javax.management, Activation, Naming
roger.riggs at oracle.com
Thu Mar 19 15:14:07 UTC 2020
The mismatches are due to the combination of generated Stub and old stub
I'll clean it up a bit before pushing. As pretty static code it didn't
seem worth much investment.
On 3/19/20 3:39 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 18/03/2020 21:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Some small updates to the source files to minimize the changes to
>> of the _Stub classes.
> All looks good but the updated ActivationGroup_Stub should probably
> get a one-pass to eliminate the inconsistencies, e.g. the new version
> imports some java.rmi.* classes but uses qualified class names in
> several places. There is unusual formatting in several places, e.g.
> L90/91. So just nits but since the entire line is changed then maybe
> run get the IDE to tidy it up before pushing.
More information about the core-libs-dev