Project Proposal: JDK 7 Update
volker.simonis at gmail.com
Sat Jun 18 16:22:31 UTC 2011
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 7:44 AM, David Holmes <David.Holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
> Volker Simonis said the following on 06/18/11 00:18:
>> Sorry, I apologize if my mail was to rude or questioned the integrity
>> of anybody on this list. I definitely didn't wanted to hurt anybody.
>> I'm just not very satisfied with how the things are going with the HSX
>> repositories compared to the HS versions in the official Oracle JDK
>> and wanted to prevent this situation for the JDK 7 update releases. If
>> my fears are without cause - that's just great!
>> Just have look at he HSX (HotSpot express) repositories on
>> hg.openjdk.java.net/ and compare the changesets there with the
>> changesets which went into the HSX version in the official Oracle
>> JDK6uXX versions
>> The difference that you'll notice is exactly the point of my mail.
> I'm afraid I'm not getting your point at all, what exactly is your concern
> with the HSX release model as it relates to the JDK6 update train? What is
> it that you see, or don't see, in the release notes that concerns you?
There are changes in the official 6uXX releases which don't get
backported to the corresponding OpenJDK hsx repositories. These are
mainly security fixes but I also recall another example which was
related to compressed strings (see
As you probaly now, the official JDK6 update releases contain HSX
version with incremented sub-numbers (HS20.1bxx, HS20.2bxx). They are
all different from the HSX repository in the OpenJDK which usually
remain at a certain build number and dont increment the sub-number. I
would definitely prefer to have one "golden" HSX repositotry in the
OpenJDK which contains ALL the changes of the corresponding HSX
versions from the closed JDK (maybe with a certain delay for security
fixes which would be no problem).
> David Holmes
More information about the discuss