benjamin.john.evans at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 12:27:32 UTC 2012
The issue of OpenJDK governance belongs on that list. Mark and others
have spent a long time ensuring that the processes for governance are
clear, and are streamlined to favour technical participation.
If you don't like the processes and want to change them, then the
first thing to do is to write some patches to OpenJDK, and convince
commiters (who are, after all, your peers) of their technical merit.
Then get yourself nominated for a commit bit.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:17 AM, John Yeary <johnyeary at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is not a helpful discussion. If you would like to discuss governance,
> please use that list.
> I am not ready to get my pitchfork and torch to burn down the citadel. This
> is not the place to foment insurrection, or rebellion.
> John Yeary
> <http://javaevangelist.blogspot.com/> <https://twitter.com/jyeary>
> "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even
> though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who
> neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight
> that knows not victory nor defeat."
> -- Theodore Roosevelt
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org> wrote:
>> hi all
>> a little discussion here.. inspired by OpenOffice model
>> which one from these statements?
>> OpenJDK is a OpenSource project which Oracle is the main contributor...
>> Oracle is the owner of OpenJDK that decide everything, and the contribution
>> model under JCP..
>> anyway, this is a discusion outside this mailinglist with several of these
>> member also :0
>> like usually, i try to raise up :)
More information about the discuss