Draft proposal: JEP 2.0
jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Sun Apr 13 01:42:40 UTC 2014
On 04/09/2014 09:41 AM, Bob Vandette wrote:
> I like the idea of using JIRA for the JEP process but ...
> Why are you proposing to continue supporting some of the JEP content in Mercurial
> form rather than using the description field in JBS and providing a template for this area
> of the JIRA entry? We've done this successfully for internal project tracking.
> If it's for format validation, you might be able to do this as part of the workflow
> process as you change states and not have to maintain information in two places.
While the current JEP pages "look nice", the current system seems like
Ad-hoc System, which now seems unnecessary given that we have a standard
issue tracking system that is designed to be capable of supporting stuff
So, another +1 on leveraging standard infrastructure, and keeping all
all together in one place.
More information about the discuss