CFV: New Project Kulla
neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com
Tue Aug 26 22:02:50 UTC 2014
Il 26/ago/2014 23:50 "Brian Goetz" <brian.goetz at oracle.com> ha scritto:
>> Yes, and although discussion before proposal is not mandatory, a project
>> this scale (and importance) should have been discussed a bit in advance I
> I think you are vastly overestimating the scale.
:) there's not much details to base my estimation!
>> The main problem here is that the JEP bug doesn't really contain much
>> details, from the look of it seems like a trivial walk in the park, but
>> then the list of high profile initial contributors is massive.
> You are reading way more into this than there is. These are simply the
members of the compiler group who are Committers to jdk; this is done
because any of these people *might* want to contribute.
> I think it is on this incorrect inference (many committers -> huge
project) that your concerns in the first paragraph rest?
Yeah, I was a bit surprised indeed (I guess like Richard?)
Anyway, I didn't mean to vote no or veto or something, just wanted to know
more about the proposal though.
More information about the discuss