CFV: New Project: s390x Port
volker.simonis at gmail.com
Thu May 19 15:03:11 UTC 2016
"same discussion as every year" :)
Please see your comments and Iris' and my replies on the same topic
back in 2012 when I started a CFV for the PowerPC/AIX project:
I hope your mail was not intended to be count as a "Veto" :)
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:59 PM, David Holmes <david.holmes at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 17/05/2016 9:25 PM, dalibor topic wrote:
>> On 16.05.2016 22:53, David Holmes wrote:
>>> On 17/05/2016 12:43 AM, dalibor topic wrote:
>>>> I believe that the discussion already took place on porters-dev:
>>> Pre-discussion perhaps :) Official discussion should have been on the
>>> discuss list.
>> Keep in mind that a separate discussion on the discuss list is
>> technically an optional step, though, per
>> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project . ;)
> Yes but I read that as "discussion is optional, but if it happens then it
> should happen on the general discussion list".
>>> Also it seems some people are sending their votes to the discuss list
>>> when they should go to the announce list.
>> Regarding votes on new Projects
>> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project has this to say:
>> "Eligible voters cast their vote by sending e-mail to the general
>> discussion list."
> Sorry - Yes I misread part of that. I was confused by the sending of the CFV
> to the announce list and the statement "Replying to this message is
> sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header." - but there is
> nothing about setting a reply-to header mentioned anywhere that I can see.
>> dalibor topic
More information about the discuss