sharing graal experiments
john.r.rose at oracle.com
Mon Feb 18 15:28:45 PST 2013
On Feb 18, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Christian Thalinger <christian.thalinger at oracle.com> wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2013, at 12:46 PM, "Deneau, Tom" <tom.deneau at amd.com> wrote:
>> Just to make sure I understand,
>> you are saying we do not need to create a separate sumatra/sumatra-dev/graal repo, we can just use Sumatra/Sumatra-dev/hotspot, which will occasionally be synced with graal/graal
>> and graal/graal will occasionally be synced with some development version of hotspot.
> Yes, that's what I thought would work best. Not sure if John has other plans.
This will work. It does not conflict with any other use of sumatra-dev that I am envisioning.
The plan of record for sumatra-dev is here:
I have only one hesitation: This move, of incorporating an advanced development project like Graal, can be done for at most one repo. Is there any other OpenJDK repo. that we would want to incorporate? I think not. If it were 12 months ago, we might want to tie more closely to lambda/collections repos. But there is no circumstance like that today. What do you think?
More information about the graal-dev