sharing graal experiments

John Rose john.r.rose at
Mon Feb 18 15:28:45 PST 2013

On Feb 18, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Christian Thalinger <christian.thalinger at> wrote:

> On Feb 18, 2013, at 12:46 PM, "Deneau, Tom" <tom.deneau at> wrote:
>> Just to make sure I understand,
>> you are saying we do not need to create a separate sumatra/sumatra-dev/graal repo, we can just use Sumatra/Sumatra-dev/hotspot, which will occasionally be synced with graal/graal
>> and graal/graal will occasionally be synced with some development version of hotspot.
> Yes, that's what I thought would work best.  Not sure if John has other plans.

This will work.  It does not conflict with any other use of sumatra-dev that I am envisioning.

The plan of record for sumatra-dev is here:

I have only one hesitation:  This move, of incorporating an advanced development project like Graal, can be done for at most one repo.  Is there any other OpenJDK repo. that we would want to incorporate?  I think not.  If it were 12 months ago, we might want to tie more closely to lambda/collections repos.  But there is no circumstance like that today.  What do you think?

— John

More information about the graal-dev mailing list