RFR: 8201318: Introduce GCThreadLocalData to abstract GC-specific data belonging to a thread

Andrew Haley aph at redhat.com
Sat Apr 14 10:42:18 UTC 2018

On 04/13/2018 08:10 PM, Per Liden wrote:
> On 04/13/2018 03:33 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 04/10/2018 01:51 PM, Per Liden wrote:
>>> A couple of commits were pushed, which causes conflicts with this
>>> change, so here's a rebased version:
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pliden/8201318/webrev.1
>> Did the Graal changes go upstream?
> I assume that will happen in the next Graal re-sync.

Does anybody do two-way syncs to Graal?  I thought we imported Graal
wholesale, but I may be wrong about that.

In the meantime, be aware that Graal development on JDK11 is broken
until this change is pushed to Graal.  As far as I know, Graal changes
are supposed to be reviewed by Graal developers.

Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671

More information about the graal-dev mailing list